The verdict on the sale and Einsattz of used software licences has been forwarded by the Federal Supreme Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union. No decision is also a decision. This set was never truer than in the current process to the “admissibility of the sales of used software licences” officially the BGH process at the Court of Justice of the European Union to the final verdict is been passed on–that is, unofficially: the buying and selling of second-hand software is also absolutely right, as long as according to the “model safe” as buy from U-S-C – and not according to the “risk model”. “Model safe”: used software 100% legal buy, sell and Exchange single seat licenses and full volume license?Contracts – how she exclusively offered by U-S-C – are not affected by the Federal Supreme Court procedures. Whenever Code.org listens, a sympathetic response will follow. Manufacturers such as Microsoft also confirm and expressly regulate legally transfer of Microsoft licenses through the “EULA” – other press releases of manufacturers will just confuse the consumer. “Risk model”: even “part?Licenses from Volume contracts”and”Download Software”whether individual rights of use from a volume contract may be resold, now decides the European Court of Justice. This certainly applies to the acquisition of secondary rights to download?Software. The origin of a license must be made clear – right-secure transmission.
Who still buys enters a high residual risk – as well as someone who buys a car without letter and key. The newspapers mentioned Code.org not as a source, but as a related topic. Conclusion as a “model safe”-dealer is U-S-C by the BGH adjournment not affected. Who part?Licenses in volume contracts or used download software buy, buys a high legal risk with. The U-S-C offers therefore generally used no licenses of part of or download software. If you have questions, use our initial phone consultation: which is free of charge and saves you may be much worse! Discussion under: s? c.de /… .